Advertisement
Advertisement
"The conclusion is not more self-defense classes for women, in the traditional sense of the word," she told VICE over the phone Thursday after disembarking said plane. "The conclusion is not: 'See, women can and must prevent rape.' That is not the conclusion of her work. that is a lazy reading of what is actually very nuanced research which challenges a lot of the narratives that are in place.""I'm so worried that the media is feeding into this narrative of once again, if a woman is sexually assaulted and she hasn't taken a self-defense class, then it was her fault because she could have prevented her rape and didn't," she continued.What you may not have read is that, according to Senn and her coauthors, other workshops designed to help women resist rape have had inconsistent effects. However, this specific workshop—which involved a component of self-defense training, but was not solely a self-defense class—was found to reduce completed rape, attempted rape, attempted coercion, and nonconsensual sexual contact.Though it reduced all other forms of rape, the workshop did not significantly decrease coercion, the researchers found."Coercion was considered to have occurred when perpetrators used pressure or manipulation (e.g., "threatening to end the relationship" or "continually verbally pressuring me") to induce compliance in nonconsensual penetrative sexual acts," the study states.The crux of Dr. Senn's project is this : The onus is on all of us prevent sexual violence & women have the right to assert their boundaries.
—Julie S. Lalonde (@JulieSLalonde) June 11, 2015.
Advertisement
Advertisement