Last week, 122 German professors of Criminal Law signed a petition demanding the decriminalisation of drugs and the legalisation of marijuana. The current anti-drugs legislation was written in 1981 and barely conforms with the constitution signed in 1994. Even back then, judges advised that the law would be enforced carefully and with restraint but the learned men who signed the petition last week think that this advice has been lost in the passage of time.
To find out exactly what they hope their petition will achieve, I called up the mastermind behind the initiative, Professor Dr Lorenz Böllinger, from the University of Bremen.
VICE: Alright Professor Böllinger. What are you aiming to do with this petition?
Lorenz Böllinger: This is an attempt to basically make Parliament function again. Constitutionally, laws must actually be scientifically justified, and they must be checked and updated regularly. That is our objective, regardless of whether drugs are dangerous or not. It's more a question of whether criminal law is capable of anything.
How do you mean?
Well, there is no way Nixon's War on Drugs can be won. Drug use goes on regardless of crime enforcement. We have seen all sorts of studies, and the result is always the same: that business cycles of drug use exist entirely independently of statutory provisions.
So you're saying that drugs will always be used.
Drugs have always existed, and the longing for this kind of pleasure will always exist. You can't question or argue with that statement.
Dr Böllinger, have you ever smoked cannabis?
I'm 68, and have smoked cannabis. I remember the good and bad parts of it very well.
Are you aiming for full legalisation?
Yes, but not in a generalised way that will have us all buying drugs at Aldi soon. The idea is to get our point across on the basis of expertise – with studies on specific regulatory models for each drug. For the least dangerous ones, like cannabis, we would make a rather extensive release, perhaps ensuring there were quantity limits or a registration process. When it comes to heroin or crystal meth, we would have to follow a stricter model.
Yeah, that'd probably be a good idea. Are you not worried that consumption rates will rise?
There is good evidence that this is not the case. In countries like Portugal, Spain and Belgium this model has existed for ten years. In the Netherlands, cannabis has been freely available for 40 years with excellent results. Consumption hasn't increased – on the contrary, it has slightly decreased.
Your petition has now been signed by over 100 experts. Why did it take so long for anyone to take the initiative like this?
That's a good question. My thesis is that nobody dares question politicians. At the same time, drug laws present an effective means to maintain certain monitoring and control functions.
Is our society ready for legalisation?
We have been brainwashed by the media and politicians for the past 40 years. Individual problem cases are massively blown out of proportion and context. Drug-related deaths, for example – these are always attributed to drugs, when the reason behind them is actually the anti-drug laws. Drug-related deaths are almost in their entirety caused by the unpredictability of the ingredients. If these drugs were prescribed, this wouldn't happen.
I am myself a professional psychoanalyst too, and have worked with heroin and cannabis addicts, and I can safely say none of their problems come from drugs. These are psychological and social problems that make people dependent.
Have you ever talked to Marlene Mortler, the Drug Commissioner of the Federal Government?
No, but I have sent her the petition. I don't expect an answer from her.
What would you say to her if you ever met her?
I can only laugh about it, really. She was appointed Drugs Commisioner this January but she's really only worked on agriculture and tourism. This is basically a statement on how much the government cares about making reforms in that field. They only want peace on this front.
Can your petition change that?
I believe that it is in our hands to draw attention to the issue. But it will bring nothing, politically. The majority will simply vote against the reforms.
Okay, Dr Böllinger. Thanks for talking to me.