Remember all those hilarious one liners about TV tough guy, and supernaturally be-gingered ghost grandpa, Chuck Norris? "Chuck Norris doesn't sleep, he waits," for example. How we laughed at those! I remember that one actor's deft karate pantomimes from my childhood, we'd say.We had him pegged with the wrong superlative it turns out. It should've been something more like Chuck Norris doesn't sleep, he drools in the corner wondering why the grandkids never call.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Likewise, Gena noted, "President Reagan went on to say that 'You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness. If we fail, at least let our children, and our children's children, say of us we justified our brief moment here. We did all that could be done.'"Wait, a thousand years of darkness? If we re-elect the same guy we've got running the show now? Seems like kind of a stretch, but alright, this lady seems pretty serious about it so maybe I better listen up.The speech in question they're referencing here is Reagan's famed "A Time for Choosing", which he delivered in 1964 in support of Republican candidate for president Barry Goldwater. It was, by most accounts, a masterful piece of speechifying, and the performance that launched Reagan's political career. There are a few different versions of it floating around, but you can read one here, and a longer version here. This is literally the Bible of politics for people whom think the Bible is a legitimate topic of discussion when it comes to politics. It's the Sgt. Peppers and Pet Sounds and Paid In Full and London Calling of conservatism.
Advertisement
Advertisement
You and I are told we must choose between a left or right, but I suggest there is no such thing as a left or right.So then it's cool if I just go ahead and vote for the non Jesus-y candidate who seems like he can pull his pants on without croaking about the tax-code based battle against the army of darkness?There is only an up or down. Up to man's age-old dream-the maximum of individual freedom consistent with order or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism.Here we go, here's the good stuff here. Liberals=totalitarianism. The only reason Regan gets off the hook a little bit here is because at least they had a literal communist super power to contend with at the time. When Chuck Norris and his ilk say this kind of thing today they are literally suggesting that Obama, our current president, is the equivalent to a giant communist country of insane drunk people who die of old age at 35.Regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would sacrifice freedom for security have embarked on this downward path.Unless we get a really bad terrorist attack on U.S. soil some day in which case security trumps the shit out of freedom, he probably should've addedPlutarch warned, "The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits."Like Jesus, you mean? But hold a minute. Imagine having the balls to say something like this? The destroyer of liberties is the one who helps people? Asking for government money to help people is a grave sin, unless you're Paul Ryan looking to get a sweet slice of that Obamacare paper.
Advertisement
We need true tax reform that will at least make a start toward restoring for our children the American Dream that wealth is denied to no one, that each individual has the right to fly as high as his strength and ability will take him…. But we can not have such reform while our tax policy is engineered by people who view the tax as a means of achieving changes in our social structure….Right, because why would you want taxes collected from the people to go back into doing things that aid the people?Have we the courage and the will to face up to the immorality and discrimination of the progressive tax, and demand a return to traditional proportionate taxation? . . . Today in our country the tax collector's share is 37 cents of -very dollar earned. Freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp.LOL at these scared-shitless pussies. Freedom has never been so fragile? Why, just because you pay a few more cents on the dollar than you'd want to, freedom -- no, Freeedom -- is literally going to crumble? Bunch of sniveling drama queens. It gets worse though:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Long story short, the one black dude is going to steal your money.Reagan digs in a little more into the Soviet threat in the longer version:And what then? When Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we are retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary because by that time we will have weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side he has heard voices pleading for "peace at any price" or "better Red than dead," or as one commentator put it, he would rather "live on his knees than die on his feet." And therein lies the road to war, because those voices don't speak for the rest of us.Those liberals want to avoid a nuclear war. Bunch of fairies.You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all.You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said that "the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits--not animals." And he said, "There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty."All of that if you elect a guy who wants rich people to pay a little more in taxes to help poor people? Seems like kind of an overreaction to me, but then again I'm not literally a greedy walking ball of shit with pokey little shit arms and a little greedy shit head with dollar signs for eyes and shoes made from the leathery hides of an orphan's skin meat.Goldwater, as you'll no doubt recall, went on to lose by one of the largest margins in presidential election history. Also, slightly more importantly, the world didn't end, metaphorically, or literally speaking, which it kind of seemed like it might at the time. In fact it got a lot better. Keep that in mind when you hear clueless ninnies like Norris trotting out this apocalyptic doom and gloom shit. A vote against socialism is a vote for Freedom, or else you are all literally going to die, or at best be enslaved, and not the good old kind. THIS TIME WE REALLY MEAN IT.@lukeoneil47