
Annoncering

Jude Wanga: My problem with the [ten-pound note] campaign is that a lot of the things that privileged, "white feminism" is highlighting these days are trivial. Women are the hardest hit by the recession, the shelters which many are having to rely upon are being closed and it smacks of privilege to raise all this money – 16 grand – to get the face of Jane Austen on a ten-pound note when many women don’t even have banknotes to look at. I don’t need to look at a woman on a banknote to feel empowered – we need gender equality to feel empowered.
Annoncering
Yes, but I come at it from an intersectional standpoint, that is, taking other oppressions – like race, class and disability – into account as well. Feminism isn’t just an ideology, it’s a lived experience and if someone identifies as a feminist then that’s that. They are a feminist, no questions asked. Feminism means different things to different people.What do you think of putting Jane Austen on the banknote?
I just thought that it was a bland choice. If we are going to fight to have a woman on the banknote, why not pick someone more exciting and inspirational, or move Fry from the £5 note to the £10 note. Choosing Jane Austen wasn’t exactly setting the movement on fire.What's the problem with the No More Page 3 campaign?
It smacks of privilege as well. They weren’t taking the needs or thoughts of the Page 3 girls, who are mainly working class and informed about their choice, into account. We shouldn’t penalise or patronise women for making this choice in a patriarchal capitalist society where we are told to make money by any means possible. If we are trying to change institutions, the way isn’t to silence these women. I also don’t see how you can call the Sun a family newspaper [as the No More Page 3 campaigners have done], regarding its content.What did you think of the #feministtenner backlash?
To be honest, I avoided looking at the hashtag. I found it all a bit absurd; it was all very navel gazing. You shouldn’t have to have a ten-pound note with Jane Austen’s face on it in order to donate to feminist causes. If these self-satisfied people cared enough about them, they would donate anyway. I tried not to pay attention to it.
Annoncering
Female masturbation isn’t sexual aggression. The person who made the wanking comment had just come up from days of abuse because of her sexuality. So to make that comment was a brave thing to do. It’s one thing to be offended because of what she said; it’s another to place her as an aggressor when you know nothing of her background or the context of her comment. There are certain prominent feminists who are using the movement to settle personal battles, and that’s not what my feminism is about.Some people have said that it is, in fact, "privileged" to talk about burning money in this current political climate. Is it?
I think that the campaign comes from a position of privilege. No one can dictate what you should do with your money, and it’s not privileged to do so. People publicly rubbish privilege theory then come back at me saying that what I said was privileged, and that is hypocritical. It’s a shame that the media chooses to focus on campaigns such as No More Page 3 and the banknote campaign instead of all the other things that we do.How can we move forward from this? Has the twitterstorm caused anything positive?
I think as feminists, criticism is healthy. Looking at what we do and how we do it is crucial. People don’t listen to us and need to listen better. It’s important to stop, take a step back, and look at a point of view that’s different from yours. Maybe this has done that.Follow Helena on Twitter: @helenasheadMore Feminists:I Spent the Weekend Watching Topless Feminists Piss Off Neo-NazisSwedish Feminists Are So Bored They're Telling Men How to Sit on the Bus