
Annoncering

Baptiste Roger-Lacan: According to the Constitution of 1958, no. Article 89 outlines that the republican form of the government can't be subject to modification. But a first modification could be made in order to make this article disappear, and a second one could re-establish the monarchy.Do you think a king could unite France?
A king would be a symbol of consensus and national unity. Monarchy wouldn’t guarantee political balance, as the Head of State wouldn't have any real power and wouldn't have been elected by the citizens. However, it appears to me that the European monarchies – except Spain, a particular case because of the Francoist era – are much stronger when they face political and institutional crises in comparison to the republics.
Annoncering
France does have a sort of “revolutionary tradition” but I think it's more of a barricades and riots habit. Yes, we had a very famous revolution, but the other insurrectional moments – 1830, 1848, 1871 – were only based on days of riots which concerned exclusively Paris.France suffers from a huge contradiction: We know our tradition is to be a monarchy, but we also know that by beheading Louis XVI we reached a point of no return.

The Third Republic managed to find a compromise during the 1870s, softening the revolutionary image of the republic and making it acceptable to the conservatives. Then World War II interrupted everything, and that's why Charles de Gaulle is so important. He was able to make the French believe that the Vichy government was just a parenthesis in French history – an illegal and illegitimate regime. The Republic has triumphed thanks to him.We also have to underline the incompetence of the candidates for the throne, especially the house of Bourbon. They are lame and they have never been a serious alternative.Why do we associate monarchy with social conservatism, especially on questions such as same-sex marriage and the role of the Church?
There are no general rules on this. The monarchists and the conservatives banded together because the French revolutionaries fought the King and the Church at the same time. Historically, some monarchies have been very liberal.
Annoncering

Hard to say. The Napoleonic regime was based on plebiscite, which means that it's not really a question of dynastic legitimacy. We have to ask ourselves if the Empire is more likely to be restored than the monarchy.What's your opinion on that?
In times of “controlled” crisis, it seems highly unlikely that one of these regime will re-appear. But if one day we actually do come face to face with the collapse of our political and economic structure, who knows?Thanks a lot, Baptiste. Follow Romain on Twitter.
