
Advertisement
Moises Saman: Yeah, that was the first time I had any interest in photojournalism. Seeing that work in the mid- and late 1990s was an inspiration.That seems odd, even by the standards of war reportage—the Balkans conflict always seemed to me a brutal and especially grim war. What was it that hooked you?
I don’t know if it was necessarily anything particular about the photos, though amazing work was done there. I think it was more to do with that specific period in my life. It was a time when everything clicked in my head—when I started paying attention to the news and the world. Covering that war day in, day out was the moment that I "dialed in," if you know what I mean. I became interested in the world beyond my personal bubble.

I went in 1999, in the summer. I was totally unprepared and it was a badly thought-out trip. My good friend who was meant to be with me pulled out, so I went alone. I maxed out my credit card and didn’t sell one picture from the trip. I had tried to read up on the situation, but once I was actually there, I realized I didn’t know what I was doing at all.
Advertisement
I don’t know if "resent" is the right word. But I don’t like it. I think it’s full of connotations that don’t really represent what I'm about as a photographer. It’s true that I tend to work in a lot of conflict zones. Somehow I hope my work is not just seen as something that is only related to conflict—people killing people and so on. Within the context of violence and repression, I try to find some moments that transcend that.Sometimes it doesn’t work, of course, but it’s what I aim for. I look for moments that we can all relate to. It's not just about showing events and images that eventually we all will become numb to—pictures of dead people or violence. So "war photographer" is a term I shy away from.

The search continues. If it didn’t, I might as well stop doing this. I think the moment you become hopeless, what’s the point? But I won't lie, after so many years doing this in so many different places you do start to see the consistency of these horrible scenes. They don’t end; they just keep happening, over and over.
Advertisement
I would probably say Afghanistan. It’s the place where I have spent the most time over my career. I was there quite early, when the Northern Alliance took Kabul [in 2001], and I last went in 2010. In the beginning, there was some sense of hope. I was showing a new world to a Western audience; Afghanistan was little-known back then, and that was exciting. But as we know, things haven’t quite worked out there.In retrospect, I think I was hopeful. But more than that I was young—beginning my career, excited and finding myself in the middle of some sort of Lord of the Rings movie set. It was an amazing adventure. I was getting paid for it, and my pictures were getting seen. It couldn’t have been better. But with perspective now—and after returning there so many times—you start thinking about other things. What did my work mean? What does it have to do with what’s happening there? And you worry that there is maybe no hope.

Advertisement
In that particular photo it wasn’t too bad. Iraq at the time was still very much a police state; things tend not to get out of control in police states. Everyone is too afraid of doing the wrong thing. Real danger is somewhere like Egypt, right now. When you are in the middle of a crowd, no one is in charge. There’s no structure and that crowd can turn on you in a matter of seconds. That’s real danger. In that Iraq photo, yes, they might have beaten or killed the pilot, but I don’t think I was in real danger. Journalists are most at risk in situations without any control.You lived in Cairo until earlier this year, and you are still working there a lot, correct?
Yes. I just moved to Spain.As someone covering Egypt, and a longtime resident, it must be hard to treat the current unrest objectively. Is objectivity something you worry about?
It’s a gray area. That’s when things get tricky. I think the question of objectivity, for me, is a bit irrelevant. I don’t think objectivity is the true measure of one’s work. I think honesty is more important. Am I being honest with what I want to say and the work I am doing? That’s a question I ask myself. But in these situations where you are so attached to what’s going on, your opinions and first-hand experiences all matter. And of course, in a place where you are working for months or even years, you inevitably have a stake in that place—if you didn’t, you would be a robot. Emotions and feelings are real. I will try to be objective on assignment for a newspaper, doing journalism, but for my long-term projects—like the Egypt work—it’s honesty that I am looking for.
Advertisement

It’s about the revolution in Egypt and the broader Arab Spring—the issues it raised at the time and since. This new search for identity in parts of the Middle East. That’s what I am trying to look into. But I am trying to look at it in a more… maybe I would say "a lyrical way." It’s not a journalism book. It’s not a timeline of events; it’s a personal narrative.You have worked with Human Rights Watch before. Do you subscribe to the idea that a photographer is obliged to try to improve the situations in which he or she works?
That’s the goal, isn’t it? But I also think that we can't fool ourselves or become too idealistic. If you do, you will become a caricature of yourself. I am aiming to contribute to the dialogue on these issues. Obviously, if a picture I take or a story I do has some actual impact that’s palpable or changes lives, then that’s amazing; I hope all my work does that. But the truth is that that doesn’t happen often. You can still contribute, raise awareness, and keep hammering at the issues, though. I think that’s a good cause.


Advertisement












