
Supporters of the pipeline say it's necessary. While most of the gas it will carry is already coming into New York by a more circuitous route through Long Island, the Rockaway Lateral will offer a more direct route, and help meet the city's increasing reliance on natural gas. That growing demand is driven in large part by a Bloomberg-era policy phasing out the use of much dirtier heating oils in building boilers."The ironic thing about the protests is that those who oppose this project for environmental reasons ignore the fact that the environmental benefits of natural gas is exactly what is driving this project," said Chris Stockton, a spokesman for Williams Transco, the company building the pipeline. "This project was specifically cited in [former] Mayor Bloomberg's PLANYC 2030 as important to helping the city achieve its clean air goals by eliminating the use of high-sulfur fuel oil."But not everyone is convinced the pipeline is a particularly wise idea. For one thing, the pipeline runs under two of New Yorkers' most beloved beaches and a delicate wildlife habitat that includes nesting grounds for endangered piping plovers. Ordinarily, energy companies can't just run gas pipelines through federal land. But in 2012 Staten Island Congressman (and former FBI agent) Michael Grimm, who infamously once threatened to throw a reporter off the Capitol rotunda in Washington, introduced a give-away bill granting an exception to permit Williams to build the pipeline.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement