Carnival-goers observing a minute's silence in memory of the victims of the Grenfell Tower fire. Photo: Yui Mok/PA Wire/PA Images
The effect of a unified voice is neatly made at an event like Carnival. Political in its very essence, it was started by anti-racist campaigner Claudia Jones in the wake of the Notting Hill riots of August, 1958. As a result, the politicisation of public space and who is allowed ownership of it undercuts the event. Notting Hill Carnival is about being visible and defiant – when, for instance, the Met Police disproportionately equate it with drugs and violence. It is also, crucially, about reclaiming streets in the same way the Latin American community of Elephant and Castle do during their festival in Burgess Park; how Muslim, Sikh and Hindu communities feel when celebrating Vaisakhi on the streets of Southall. It is about staking a claim.Reclaiming physical space is important because sometimes it is the first step in carving out ideological space – which might lead to institutions seeing you and hearing your concerns. Something Kensington and Chelsea council (RBKC) famously failed to do when Grenfell residents complained about fire safety, months before the fire tore the building apart.Earlier this month, Lee Jasper, a chair at the London Race and Criminal Justice Consortium, and former policing director for the Greater London Authority, made his thoughts about public safety clear in a piece for The Guardian. In relation to crowd control he wrote:"Carnival is about reminding people that we're here, and that building, that block, that tower is about reminding people that people are not getting justice."
He went on:"In light of the Grenfell and Hillsborough tragedies, the issue of public safety has risen up the public and political agenda. The fact that over the last decade [Kensington and Chelsea council, the Met police and the London mayor's office] have consistently fudged the question of carnival public safety has very likely put Londoners' lives at risk."
There is a tension between what communities expect from the state when it comes to safety and what they're actually provided, and Grenfell has made the demand for better duty of care something that people with institutional power are being forced to think about.Of course, Carnival wasn't just a place for celebration and remembrance. There are fears from some Grenfell residents that it was being used as a stalling tactic, the reason why RBKC – which is required to respond to weekly complaints in two working days – have failed to respond to the first submission received on the 28th of July. Or why there are still unanswered questions about the uncertain death toll in Grenfell Tower, rehousing options, rent payments for people still living in the neighbourhood and trauma counselling.Either way, with the incompetence we continue to see from RBKC, large community gatherings are more crucial than ever – to help challenge state and media narratives, and to ensure justice is served. Carnival was – and proved to be – a prime opportunity for the local community to reclaim space while firmly in the public eye, while the shadow of Grenfell was a reminder that a generation has been mobilised to speak up, to challenge power.On Latimer Road, local Marcus Steel – who was selling T-shirts and horns – perhaps said it best. "You want people to remember what happened," he pointed out. "Carnival is about reminding people that we're here, and that building – that block, that tower – is about reminding people that people are not getting justice. You can't have a street party without reminding people what is happening on these streets!"@kieran_yates"Who in the event of a catastrophic crushing at carnival (the most likely high-risk scenario), would be held legally responsible for public safety?"