
Advertisement
The main problem is that the scale of the results are completely off-balance. Mugabe’s 61 percent majority (up from 43 percent in 2008) is not only suspiciously huge, but also conveniently exempts him from a run-off election, like the one we saw in 2008. Zanu-PF’s victory also gives them a two-thirds majority, which is the amount needed to amend the constitution that was only voted in a few months shy of this election.
Advertisement

Intimidation strategies are Mugabe’s forte—and, considering he’s been working that angle since his first election in 1980, he’s had plenty of time to master the craft. This election was no different. Both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have confirmed large-scale intimidation, contradicting the “free and peaceful” assessment put forward by the AU and SADC.A website allowed Zimbabweans to report any discrepancies, which—with 710 entries, including "Man displaying gun to voters" and "War veterans forcing people to vote for Mugabe"—seems to suggest that intimidation isn't merely a figment of Tsvangirai's imagination. Not that Zanu-PF have been keeping their winning tactic much of a secret, displaying slogans like, “Zanu-PF can torture you anytime, the youths can beat you,” and, “If they oppose, we cut off their hands. If they oppose, we cut off their head.”Speakers at rallies are even telling the people that supporting MDC is a one-way ticket to hell.THE VOTERS’ ROLL DEBACLE
Firstly, a widespread rumour suggests that Zanu-PF brought in an Israeli company called NIKUV to help manipulate the voters’ roll. This was in order to increase the number of registered Zanu-PF supporters and involved duplications and the inclusion of plenty of dead people, with as many as 63 constituencies showing more registered voters than inhabitants.
Advertisement
There is video evidence of Zanu-PF youths being bused in from undisclosed rural areas to dilute the vote in MDC strongholds. Tendai Biti, the MDC Secretary General, saw this happen and raised the alarm, but the bus driver refused to answer his questions. Biti then approached a member of the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission, who said he didn’t have the “authority” to do anything about it. Which kind of makes you wonder who exactly does have the authority to do anything about it. ASSISTING THE ILLITERATE
Many people in Zimbabwe’s rural areas don’t know how to read or write, which makes handling a ballot paper a tricky business. These people are entitled to an objective assistant when entering the voting booth, but in Zimbabwe "objective" means something more along the lines of "devious", meaning voters are often duped by Zanu-PF assistants. This year, in one area of Mashonaland Central (an area notorious for violence in the 2008 elections), it’s estimated that 10,500 of 17,000 voters were “assisted.”
Advertisement
