Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
"This is about the context in which the threats were made," said Southworth, whose organization wrote en extensive amicus brief explaining the techie aspects of modern-day domestic violence."When we talk to victims, I don't know a single survivor of domestic violence or stalking who has only experienced one single tactic. They will threaten online and slash the tires," said Southworth. "What makes those online threats so scary is that they typically have physical violence happening at the same time. Once you've killed the family pet, that threat on Facebook has so much more meaning."If Elonis is a sadly typical case of online domestic harassment, then why did associations representing every newspaper in the country weigh in with an amicus brief citing concerns about free speech?"Anytime the Supreme Court is asked to decide something, it's not just going to decide the one case before it, it's going to set a new rule for all speech," Gregg Leslie, Legal Defense Director at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, told VICE. "The court reaches beyond this particular statute and could say something about what type of speech is not protected by the First Amendment.Once you've killed the family pet, that threat on Facebook has so much more meaning.
Advertisement