FYI.

This story is over 5 years old.

News

Butchered While Giving Birth: the Victims of a Cruel Operation in Ireland Are Still Searching for Justice

'Symphysiotomy' involves having your pelvis unhinged using a saw while you're having a baby.

Survivors of Symphysiotomy SOS protesting their treatment by the Irish state (Photo courtesy of SOS)

Warning: The medical procedures described in this article are completely disgusting. Reader discretion is advised.

Their legs were fastened in stirrups while nurses bustled around them, ignoring their cries for help. Some who had been unconscious woke up to the searing pain of being cut with a hacksaw – butchered as part of an unnecessary, cruel operation carried out by Irish doctors on women as they gave birth.

Advertisement

This was symphysiotomy – a high-risk medical procedure that during childbirth, rips through one of the main pelvic joints, unhinging the pelvis. In developing countries where caesarean's are not possible, it can be an unsafe but potentially life saving procedure of last resort in complicated births. But for over 40 years, Irish women were subjected to this ordeal just to appease the Catholic church – something that the Irish government refuses to take responsibility for.

Survivor testimonies make for uncomfortable reading. Cora was just 17-years-old when she underwent this brutal procedure. She said:

"There was an awful lot of young people there, ten at least. He told two young nurses to hold my arms, so I don't look at what he was doing. I felt being cut. I can feel everything, I said – I was screaming – 'it's not working'. I felt the pure instinct of death. The nurses were getting sick, they'd leave, I could see them looking horrified. I could feel all that pain, they were not mentioning the baby, I felt it tightening round me. The nurses let go of me and I seen him go and take out a proper hacksaw, like a wood saw, the same thing as for wood – a half-circle with a straight blade and a handle. He took it out of the black case … No nurses had the strength to hold me down. It was out of this world, the torture. The blood shot up to the ceiling, up onto his glasses, all over the nurses. 'I'll get you in the next world', I thought. Then he goes to the table, and gets something like a solder iron and puts it on me, and stopped the bleeding. It was death. I knew I was being killed, there was blood coming out of me."

Advertisement

Symphysiotomy and it's horrific variant, pubiotomy – a procedure that involves breaking the pelvic bone during childbirth – were carried out sporadically on pregnant Irish women from the late 1930s with the last reported case going through the courts in 2005. Its surviving victims are still waiting for real justice from the Irish state.

Practiced in the 18th century, symphysiotomy was cast aside for the safer, less invasive practice of caesareans by the 20th Century. But in the 1940s, as the Irish republic grappled with forging its new identity, the dictum of the Catholic church was an invasive dogma in the lives of ordinary people. This oppression reached its zenith when it came to female sexuality. Women were warned of the evils of contraception from the pulpit and some doctors – fearing a rise in birth control – used symphysiotomy to widen the pelvis. The aim was to physically encourage multiple vaginal births in a woman's lifetime, unlike caesareans, which were seen to limit pregnancies. In fact, some doctors broke the pelvis after a woman had given birth to prevent further caesareans believing this would encourage women to bear more children.

As a Catholic, you need to go through the pains of childbirth – if you had a Caesarean, you wouldn't. The baby is as big as yourself – why do small women marry big men? I'll have to stretch your hips and straighten your pelvis.

In a submission to the United Nations Committee Against Torture, symphysiotomy survivor called Hannah claims Dr De Valera – one of the most prolific perpetrators of the practice – told her it was part of being a "good Catholic".

Advertisement

"De Valera said, 'but because you are such a good a Catholic, I'll do a symphysiotomy, you're a Catholic family, you'd be expected to have at least ten – if you have a Caesarean, you can only have three. And, as a Catholic, you need to go through the pains of childbirth – if you had a Caesarean, you wouldn't. The baby is as big as yourself – why do small women marry big men? I'll have to stretch your hips and straighten your pelvis'."

Hannah adds: "I had no idea what a symphysiotomy was".

Women like Hannah were also used to train doctors going to Africa, as symphysiotomy was a cheap Catholic practice in keeping with missionary ideology. One survivor, Cora, remembers being told, "Dr Sheehan was just back from Africa, and he flew up from Dublin to do this operation, he was two years in Africa, and his hands were blessed by the Pope". Terrified, she begged the nurses for information about what was going to happen to her. They said if they told her, they would be sacked.

According to the UN committee, symphysiotomies were carried out in several hospitals throughout the country by zealous doctors; like Dr De Valera, Dr Sheehan, Dr Barry and Dr Spain – high-ranking medics often support by the Medical Missionaries of Mary, a Catholic medical institute.

A symphysiotomy survivor protesting. The shoes are a sardonic reference to the difficulty walking that those who go through the procedure can experience (Photo courtesy of SOS)

Victims of their brutal procedures live a lifetime burdened with physical pain including incontinence and difficulties walking. Some women lost their children during the procedure and many suffer from PTSD – a result of being conscious as doctors sawed through their pelvic bone. Women also face a lifetime of sexual difficulties and depression.

Advertisement

Last July a delegation from Survivors of Symphysiotomy (SOS) went to Geneva to present a submission to the United Nations Committee Against Torture. The Irish State was accused of being complicit in the practice of symphysiotomies and in failing the survivors by denying them restitution and a right to fair and adequate compensation.

The Irish Minister for Justice Frances Fitzgerald, defended the government's much criticised redress scheme which provided payments of €50,000 (38,700), €100,000 or €150,000 depending on the severity of the injury (bear in mind if you break your leg in Ireland you might be paid €50,000 in compensation). The scheme also came with a toxic ex gratia tag. This means the state does not have to admit liability or legal obligation. The government's message was clear: take the money and shut up.

While the scheme has been widely condemned as a farce, the Irish government reportedly told the UN that women consented to having their pelvises broken. This bizarre claim flies in the face of survivor testimony.

The government has defended their redress scheme, despite meagre pay-outs and a limited application time of just 20 days. They claim that by settling quickly they are protecting elderly people from a lengthy court case.

Human rights lawyer Mairead Enright who advised SOS, disagrees. "It is incredibly disingenuous of this government to talk about protecting women from the legal process, when the defendants in the cases are either the state directly, or the state as ultimate insurer of the hospital," she said. "So, when the government says 'we're protecting elderly women from the law' that's not true. The state has a dog in each fight. To put it simply: the government is protecting the women from their own legal team."

Advertisement

The government has also been criticised for using the survivors age as leverage to push forward a poor redress scheme; a sort of blackmail policy against elderly women. Despite the flaws many survivors have accepted compensation through the scheme.

MP Clare Daly believes the government has bullied survivors and their families into accepting an inferior scheme and are – essentially – waiting for them to die. "These women are elderly, the government know that each year there's a delay people fall off the list as women get older and die. The families then feel under pressure to take the scheme. It's horrible blackmail," she said.

Daly feels the government has shirked its responsibilities. "It's a protective smokescreen," she said. "It's an attitude saying these are elderly women, throw them a few bob shut them up and they'll go away. This is designed to fob off the women and protect the medical hierarchy, still dominant in our hospitals today. On the other you have a clear-cut international walloping of Ireland over this issue. It's quite clear what is required of Ireland from a human rights point of view and this scheme seems to be ignoring that," she said.

Until the victims of symphysiotomy get a full apology and adequate compensation, the Irish state will be denying justice to the victims of the most horrific abuse.

@normcos

More from Ireland:

The Charlie Hebdo Massacre Raises Awkward Questions for Free Speech in Ireland

Ireland Deserves a Referendum on Abortion

Ireland Definitely Isn't the Best Country in the World