Early Thursday morning, a New York City neighborhood went on red alert after someone called the cops to report a tiger was roaming the streets of Washington Heights, NBC New York reports. A news chopper descended on the neighborhood frantically looking for the fanged beast, while reporters and police scrambled to track it down on the ground. Denizens scanned Citizen, a crime-reporting app, looking for any update on where the bloodthirsty creature might be.
At the end of a harrowing 20 minutes, the cops finally got their hands on the animal wreaking havoc on Upper Manhattan. Turns out it wasn't actually a tiger; instead, whoever reported the thing had, bafflingly, actually spotted a raccoon.
Because it's not already abundantly clear, this seems like an appropriate time to provide a PSA for the lovely, fauna-illiterate citizens of New York—a simple, go-to guide you can turn to any time you're wondering whether what your looking at is a vicious, jungle-dwelling killing machine, or an annoying little trash panda.
For starters, this is a tiger:
This, on the other hand, is a raccoon:
As you can see, tigers are orange and white, with black stripes, as such:
Whereas raccoons, an entirely different beast altogether, are typically grayish-black, with white underbellies, and a black "mask" across their eyes that makes them look like little rodent burglars. Take a gander:
When riled up or threatened, tigers tend to bare their teeth, or perhaps even roar, displaying their sizable jowls and intimidating fangs:
Raccoons, however, are virtually incapable of looking even remotely intimidating, unless they're inexplicably acting like zombies. Unlike tigers, even if they try to show off their incisors, they still just wind up looking cute, harmless, and a little bewildered:
Let's do this one last time, just to be safe. Tiger:
Got it? You sure? Great.
Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.
Follow Drew Schwartz on Twitter.
Related: A Rare Sumatran Tiger Was Born at the National Zoo