News by VICE

Trump has to get tougher on Russia thanks to this obscure '90s law

Because of an elaborate flourish of Cold War espionage the pair of Russian spies allegedly employed in the U.K., Moscow is facing more sanctions.

by Greg Walters
Sep 11 2018, 7:15pm

On September 5, Britain indicted two Russian agents for trying to kill a renegade former spy, and vowed to bring them to justice if they ever step foot off Russian soil again.

London quickly followed up by asking Interpol to post international arrest warrants for the two men, and plastered their faces across the internet.

But the global manhunt for two spies may be the least of Russia’s worries when it comes to the bungled assassination.

Thanks to the elaborate flourish of Cold War espionage the pair allegedly employed — spraying their target with a rare chemical nerve agent hidden in a fake perfume bottle — Moscow is facing the prospect of yet more economic sanctions.

People in military hazardous material protective suits collect an item in Queen Elizabeth Gardens in Salisbury, Britain, July 19, 2018. (REUTERS/Hannah McKay)

An obscure 1991 law intended to punish foreign governments for the use of chemical weapons against their own nationals has Russia bracing for yet another round of potentially brutal economic sanctions. And despite Trump’s famously chummy approach toward Russian President Vladimir Putin, his administration has little choice but to blast Russia with a new round of economic sanctions, observers told VICE News.

Moscow bitterly nicknamed the U.S. "the United Sanctions of America" after the last round of Skripal-related sanctions in August. But experts expect the next stage to be even harsher — piling on to the 40-plus individual sanctions already choking the life out of Russia’s economy, according to a tally by Washington’s Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Short of a convincing mea culpa or granting unprecedented access to international chemical weapons investigators, Russia has little means of escaping these legally binding sanctions.

Recent history suggests the Trump administration may actually deliver. In January, the Treasury Department effectively ducked a mandate by Congress to name and shame Russian oligarchs, in what became known as the “Kremlin Report,” by releasing a meaningless reprint of the Forbes 100 list of Russia’s richest people. But after the Skripal episode, the U.S. joined the U.K. and others in expelling dozens of Russian diplomats, and in April launched some the toughest sanctions against Russia yet.

The Trump administration has until mid-November to either slap Russia with more penalties or make the politically perilous argument that punishing Russia again somehow harms U.S. national security.

Analysts say Trump will face political pressure not to be seen as giving Russia a pass during the run-up to the midterms in November, which come days before the deadline.

“They’ll almost certainly have to do something,” said Thomas Graham, who served as senior director for Russia in former President George W. Bush’s National Security Council. “The worst case would be something truly draconian, though I personally think extreme measures are unlikely.”

When the 1991 law was written, few envisioned it might be used against a country with an economy the size of Russia’s, Graham said. Now, the twin pressures of Moscow’s aggressive foreign policy and U.S. domestic politics have merged with this little-known law to push Russia one more step down the path of seemingly endless sanctions, Russia-watchers told VICE News.

“If you take this to the extreme, you’re heading for an economic embargo and an effort to crush the Russian economy, with no thought to what the implications of that might be.”

Some observers now worry that, one sanction at a time, the U.S. is locking itself into a policy that lacks a broader strategy or clear, coherent goals.

“If you take this to the extreme, you’re heading for an economic embargo and an effort to crush the Russian economy, with no thought to what the implications of that might be,” Graham told VICE News. “What’s missing in all the discussions of sanctions is what the Russians can do in response.”

The next round

The White House launched an initial, smaller round of sanctions required by the law in August, covering the exports of U.S. technology with national security implications. A senior State Department official told reporters at the time that this first step may hit hundreds of millions of dollars worth of exports, including certain types of engines, heavy machinery, and electronics.

U.S. President Donald Trump receives a football from Russian President Vladimir Putin as they hold a joint news conference after their meeting in Helsinki, Finland July 16, 2018. REUTERS/Grigory Dukor/File Photo

The looming second step could be far more damaging, depending on how the administration dials it in, analysts told VICE News. The law requires the White House to pick at least three items of a menu of six options.

“They can get away with doing very little,” said Olga Oliker of CSIS, adding, “Or they can do a great deal.”

The six options are:

—Block all exports to Russia of goods and technology (except food)

—Block all imports from Russia — including oil, Russia’s top export

—Downgrade or suspend diplomatic relations with Russia

—Oppose all loans to Russia by multilateral lending institutions

—Prohibit U.S. banks from making loans to the Russian government

—Place limits on air service between the U.S. and Russia

Russia has adamantly denied trying to kill Skripal, who survived the attack. But those denials aren’t enough to wriggle out of the requirements of the 1991 CBW Act, which mandates conditions to lift the sanctions that, in this case, border on the ludicrous, analysts said.

“The Skripal operation was a big middle finger to Western intelligence.”

Once enacted, the law says that the new penalties can be removed only if Russia makes restitution to the victims of the chemical attack.

The Trump administration can also opt to take a national security waiver for any of these punishments — but doing so would mean putting forward an argument that punishing Russia with tougher sanctions would somehow have a negative impact on U.S. national security.

No end in sight

“The sanctions are just going to keep coming,” said Oliker, director of the Russia and Eurasia Program at CSIS. “If the West is trying to get Russia to change policy, that doesn’t seem to be working.”

Nevertheless, sanctions have become Washington’s favored policy toward Russia, a policy it shows no sign of reversing anytime soon, political analysts told VICE News.

“The different sanctions are now becoming merged among one another, which makes it much more difficult to abandon them,” said Anders Aslund, who once worked as an economic adviser to former Russian President Boris Yeltsin.

“Russia keeps doing these things that make it harder for them get sanctions relaxed."

This rising wall of sanctions will help ensure Russia’s economy remains “stuck” in weak 1.5 percent annual economic growth, said Aslund. He calculates that sanctions and other related problems are costing Russia up to $60 billion a year, or roughly 4 percent of the country’s economy.

Ultimately, Russia’s own provocative actions are largely to blame, analysts said.

“Russia keeps doing these things that make it harder for them get sanctions relaxed, or find a better relationship with the U.S., or even isolate the U.S. by splitting off European countries,” said Joshua Tucker, director of the Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of Russia at New York University.

And the hits just keep coming. On Tuesday, NBC News reported that Russia has emerged as the main suspect among American investigators probing a mysterious illness among U.S. diplomatic staff stationed in Cuba and China.

Experts on spycraft say Russia appears to revel in pushing the boundaries of what’s considered tolerable by other countries, especially the West — as in the case with the attempt on Skripal.

“They carried out a weapons-of-mass destruction attack in England,” Malcolm Nance, a longtime intelligence analyst, told VICE News. “The Skripal operation was a big middle finger to to Western intelligence.”

In this case, the legal requirement for fresh sanctions actually could’ve been avoided if the alleged spies had just been a bit less creative.

Aleksandr Gusak, a retired colonel in Russia’s FSB spy agency, told The New York Times last week that Russians take a harsh view of double agents like Skripal, a view that’s been publicly echoed by Putin himself.

But Gusak said that if he’d carried out the attack on Skripal, he would have used “a sword rather than a spray.”

Gusak’s preferred weapon notwithstanding, the former spy unknowingly touched on the irony of this particular case: If the accused assassins had simply opted for anything other than a chemical weapon, they wouldn’t have triggered the U.S. law, and Russia’s next round of sanctions, at least, might not be coming at all.

Cover image: Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, who were formally accused of attempting to murder former Russian intelligence officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury, are seen in an image handed out by the Metropolitan Police in London, Britain September 5, 2018. Metroplitan Police handout via REUTERS

putin rusia
Russia sanctions
russian spy UK,
UK Russian spy
Russian spy attack
Russian spying