Do You Think Britain Should Arm Syria's Rebels?

Photo by Rick Findler.

So David Cameron has suggested that the UK should consider vetoing the EU's arms embargo on Syria to help out the rebels. Unsurprisingly, Russia – being allies of Syria and everything – don't like the sound of those plans, suggesting that the Syrians should be left to resolve their own issues. But, more importantly, what do some people on the streets of London think?

Is it just another case of the West stomping its autocratic boot down where it doesn't belong, trying to police the world from their Subway-catered war rooms? Or is it much-needed aid to a group who could desperately do with some help in toppling the man who's made their lives hell? London, do you think Britain should arm Syria's rebels?

Nick, student: It sounds like a bad idea.

Why do you say that?
I’m not a ridiculous, peace-loving person, but when you hear about anyone giving anyone weapons, it doesn’t sound like a good idea.

Fair point.

Gaya, squatter: I’m a bit confused, because on the one hand Assad seems to be unstoppable and dangerous, but, on the other hand, I read a lot of bad stuff done by Syrian rebels, so I don’t think it’s black and white.

So what do you suggest?
The rebels' struggle is right, but not if they’re also harming civilians. I don’t know, to be honest.

Fanny, bartender: No! No way! It’s not the answer – the answer is never weapons, you have to talk first.

So Britain shouldn’t arm the rebels?
Obviously it’s not that easy to talk. But why fighting? Why? I mean, obviously I’m not over there, I’ve never been in Syria. I understand why people feel like they need weapons to be safe, but we should try to find another way.

Aisha, trainee lawyer: I think it’s a bad idea. Firstly, Britain will be indirectly entering into war with Syrian allies, who are Russia and Iran. Also, the rebels haven’t really demonstrated how they could rule. Things could turn more hostile and people could end up in a worse off position. However, I do think that the West needs to impose harsher sanctions on Syria and do something about Assad.

So you think there are other ways to intervene?
I think directly arming and training rebels, although what Assad’s regime is doing is brutal, gives out a very strong message that you're aligned with the rebel cause and the Russians and the Iranians could retaliate.

So you’re fearful of a proxy war spilling over into something greater?
Yeah, and I don’t think that non-hostile ways to assist in Syria have been exhausted yet. I think they need to be explored more.

James (left), Haroon (centre) and Joe, students.

Haroon: It’s alright. It’s a good idea. We’re helping them out, innit.

What do you then think arming the rebels could achieve?
James: They have to save their own lives. If Britain gives them more weapons, they’ll be able to defend themselves and end the war.

Previously - What Would Change If They Introduced a Minimum Price for Alcohol?