Nigerian demonstrators in London trying to raise awareness of Boko Haram after a four-day massacre by the group that killed around 2,000 people. Photo by Jake Lewis
VICE: First off, how did Boko Haram arise?
Virginia Comolli: Officially, they emerged in the early 2000s. However, they are hardly a new occurrence for the northeastern part of Nigeria. This region of the world has a long history of violent, religious extremists, particularly the northeastern part of Nigeria. During the post-colonial period, several of these groups emerged. The most infamous are [Yan Tatsine, led by the Islamic preacher] Maitatsine, who launched large-scale riots in Kano in the 1980s. Boko Haram merges out of this tradition, very much seeding the many socio-economic and political grievances that are still pretty widespread in that part of Nigeria.During the initial years you could describe them as an isolated, mainly non-violent sect, leading very secluded lives, not mixing with mainstream Muslims. What we see now, from 2009 to 2010, is a group that is capable of waging a large-scale insurgency against the state, that engages in terrorist attacks and that relies on a variety of criminal activity to sustain itself.Boko Haram manages to recruit both the poverty-stricken and the well-educated. How do you think they manage to appeal to such disparate groups?
It's very important you make this assertion, because often people wrongly equate poverty with extremism, claiming people with no economic opportunity would automatically turn to violent or criminal groups. But that is often not the case. Evidence suggests that, during the early days, wealthy, educated individuals—children of the Nigerian middle-class—would actually join the movement. And of course, people from less wealthy backgrounds would join also, attracted by economic opportunities.
Advertisement
Boko Haram is a very fluid and non-monolithic group. People there may fully or partly espouse the violent radical ideology, truly believing that the groups should fight for the establishment of an Islamic state in Nigeria. And for some, it's because of lack of alternative opportunities, political grievances, or simply because they seek revenge for instances where they've been wrongly targeted by security forces.
Advertisement
Muhammadu Buhari, who has a poor history of human rights abuses and is a known disciplinarian, came back into power earlier this year after ruling the country for a time in the 1980s. How do you think he's going to manage the task of fighting Boko Haram?READ ON VICE NEWS: Nigerian Army Raids Boko Haram Camps, Rescuing More Than 300 People
Buhari unfortunately inherited a long list of challenges from the political scene in terms of the economy and security, which is also to do with the middle belt, where there's been a resurgence of Biafra separatist sentiment.Boko Haram is the number one priority. This was made clear during his election campaign. He said he would ensure that they would feel the full force of the Nigerian military. And one of the first few initiatives he implemented when he took office was to change all the heads of the armed forces and to relocate the 7th Division—the army division responsible for the counter-insurgency operations—to Maiduguri, the capital city of Borno State, where Boko Haram operate.Buhari has a history of being very authoritarian. During his first time in office in the 80s, his administration was marred by a number of human rights violations. It was very telling that this time round, even during his short inaugural speech, he devoted a couple of lines to the issue of human rights violations. This was a very important step, because the previous administration, the Jonathan administration [often denied abuses], despite all the reports published by the likes of Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and others, who provided evidence of human rights violations conducted by the security forces.
Advertisement
Yes. He feels very strongly about the need to eradicate corruption, and it's very much needed, as it's had an impact on fueling Boko Haram's recruitment drive and also in undermining the military efforts. The defense budgets have increased annually for the past several years, however there's been many instances where soldiers on the front line had complained or had to run away because they were not supplied with sufficient weaponry.
Related: Watch VICE News' film 'The War Against Boko Haram'
What's the best antidote to such an adaptable group?
Adaptable is a perfect way to describe them. We've seen it on so many levels in the way they've changed their tactics, their operation theaters, their funding revenues, always trying to find a better way to adapt to a changing situation and catch security off-guard.I think you need a very much multi-layered approach. Of course, you need the security and the defense component so you can create some form of safety and stability. Once some level of security has been re-established, a continuation of it needs to be carried out in parallel with other projects, such as economic rejuvenation, which is very much needed across the north, particularly the northeast, where the highest percentage of people in severe poverty are.
Advertisement