She wasn't one of the officials discussed in the Times piece—she couldn't have been, since she wasn't part of the White House. She was just saying she encouraged her old buddies to keep that information about Russian hacking intact.Two days after that interview Trump claimed on Twitter that Obama had wiretapped him. Why does that matter? Well, after conservative media spread Farkas's comments in late March, outlets like FOX News began reporting on the weeks-old interview as proof that the Obama administration had been spying on Trump's campaign and transition team. Which brings us to Friday's press briefing, where Spicer regurgitated the Farkas narrative. He told reporters:I was urging my former colleagues, and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill — it was more, actually, aimed at telling the Hill people: Get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration, because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people that left.
This is a rather disingenuous reading of Farkas's statement. It implies that Farkas was encouraging people to leak, rather than just preserve information, and ignores that Farkas stopped working for the administration in 2015. As she emphasized in an interview with the conservative Daily Caller on Thursday, "I had no intelligence whatsoever, I wasn't in government anymore and didn't have access to any."Spicer isn't the only Trump administration official to mention Farkas. On Thursday, Reince Priebus, the White House chief of staff, told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt that Farkas's statement was "incredible," saying if "that has anything to do with the issues in regard to surveillance of Trump transition team members is something that we need to figure out this morning and throughout the day."It seems pretty figured out.Follow Eve Peyser on Twitter.The substance—the unmasking and leaks—is what we should all be concerned about. It affects all Americans, our liberties, our freedom, our civil liberties. Let's talk about some of the substance. On March 2, the day before the president's tweet, comments from a senior administration official foreign policy expert Dr. Evelyn Farkas, together with previous reports that have been out, raised serious concerns on whether or not there's been an organized and widespread effort by the Obama administration to use and leak highly sensitive information for political purposes. She admitted this on television by saying, "I was urging my former colleagues, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill, I was telling people on the Hill, 'Get as much information as you can. Get as much intelligence as you can.' I had a fear that they were essentially watching the Trump staff and he was worried about the Trump administration." That's what's out there, and I know NBC News has just reported something very similar… Dr. Farkas's admission alone is devastating.