
More recently, when asked whether Bahrain should be allowed to host a Grand Prix because of its terrible human rights record, he equated human rights to how various countries have different speed limits. He then went on to say, "I keep asking people what human rights are. I don't know what they are. The rights are; the people that live in a country abide by the laws of the country, whatever they are.”So I’d just like to take this opportunity to enlighten Mr Ecclestone about the concept of human rights, which – to me – are relatively simple and quite hard to get confused with traffic legislation.Human rights are an international institutional regime created by the countries that formed the UN after the Second World War in order to protect people if their rights were being abused by their own state. Human rights are constructed through a process by which people fight to reclaim their dignity from oppression or persecution, rather than being natural or God-given rights. They are also aspirational, providing guidance about what should happen, not what does happen.Mr Ecclestone seems to have "rights", which are obligations on states to respect their citizens, confused with "laws", which are obligations on citizens enforced by states.
Bahraini protesters clashing with authorities.Yesterday was the Bahrain Grand Prix, a business relationship between Formula One and the Bahrain government, which has been held since 2004. Back then was a somewhat happier time for Bahrainis. In 2002, a parliamentary system was reinstated for the first time since 1975, giving women the right to vote and releasing all of the country's political prisoners. But, over the following decade, it became clear that these reforms would do absolutely nothing to stop the roots of institutional discrimination and corruption in Bahrain.
Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement